Difference between revisions of "Talk:MS Windows/Virtual Appliance"
From ZoneMinder Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Henriquejf (talk | contribs) |
Henriquejf (talk | contribs) m (Talk:MS Windows implementation development moved to Talk:MS Windows/Virtual Appliance: the previous title was not useful) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Actually, I am not interested on any ZoneMinder Windows Implementation, as I am 100% satisfied with the Ubuntu and LiveCds; but it´s not hard to imagine that there may be users out there that would like to have it done; So, in the better wiki approach, I have started this distribution specific effort; I have just searched the foruns first, and have not found anything related to that; if you know that there is a working thread regarding that, or any other observation regarding this approach, please let me know in order for me to help and not to disturb the community work! | Actually, I am not interested on any ZoneMinder Windows Implementation, as I am 100% satisfied with the Ubuntu and LiveCds; but it´s not hard to imagine that there may be users out there that would like to have it done; So, in the better wiki approach, I have started this distribution specific effort; I have just searched the foruns first, and have not found anything related to that; if you know that there is a working thread regarding that, or any other observation regarding this approach, please let me know in order for me to help and not to disturb the community work! | ||
--[[User:Henriquejf|Henriquejf]] 21: | --[[User:Henriquejf|Henriquejf]] 21:27, 31 March 2009 (BST) | ||
Latest revision as of 09:08, 18 May 2009
Actually, I am not interested on any ZoneMinder Windows Implementation, as I am 100% satisfied with the Ubuntu and LiveCds; but it´s not hard to imagine that there may be users out there that would like to have it done; So, in the better wiki approach, I have started this distribution specific effort; I have just searched the foruns first, and have not found anything related to that; if you know that there is a working thread regarding that, or any other observation regarding this approach, please let me know in order for me to help and not to disturb the community work!
--Henriquejf 21:27, 31 March 2009 (BST)
